Translaminar Facet Screw Fixation

نویسندگان

  • Rick C. Sasso
  • Natalie M. Best
چکیده

Introduction Lumbar fusion has proven to be an accepted treatment for a variety of indications. Pedicle screw fixation has historically been the gold standard for providing stabilization to the lumbar motion segment while the fusion matures. However, numerous studies have reported high complication rates, increased pain, and juxtalevel degeneration due to the size of the pedicle screw instrumentation, the necessary wide soft tissue dissection, and exposure of the cephalad facet joint (4,7,10,13,25). These criticisms of pedicle screw fixation have necessitated more minimally invasive techniques and less bulky instrumentation. Facet screw fixation was first described in 1948 by King (23). His technique involved short screws placed horizontally across the facet joint. (Figure 1) The screw enters the inferior articular process just medial to the joint and crosses the joint into the ipsilateral superior articular process. Improvements on this technique were made in 1959 by Boucher (5). His method used the same starting point as King, but the screw is directed more vertical into the base of the pedicle thereby increasing the length of screw in the caudal vertebrae. (Figure 2) Magerl changed the starting point of the screw to the junction of the contralateral spinous process and lamina. This translaminar technique described by Magerl in 1984 maximizes the strength and length of the screw both proximal and distal to the facet joint (26). (Figure 3) This technique involves a midline incision with dissection only out to the facet joints. The transverse processes and cephalad juxtalevel facet joints are not exposed. The screw used is significantly longer than that used by both Boucher and King due to an entry point at the base of the contralateral spinous process. This improves the technique by increasing the effective working length of the screw on both sides of the facet joint resulting in increased strength of the fixation. This review focuses on the advantages of translaminar facet screws as established in both the literature and in our experience. Translaminar facet instrumentation involves minimally invasive techniques without significant soft tissue dissection. Improvements over pedicle screw fixation have been shown in biomechanical stability and stiffness, complication rates, reoperation rates, operative time, blood loss, and patient perceived outcomes. Additionally, current intraoperative surgical image navigation techniques are rapidly improving which have increased the accuracy and decreased the operative time in placement of these screws.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results

BACKGROUND Conventional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw has been performed for many years with good results. The outcomes of minimally invasive TLIF (MIS TLIF) are similar to the good outcomes of open TLIF, with the additional benefits of reducing iatrogenic injury, shortening hospital stays, and reducing the reco...

متن کامل

Translaminar Facet Screw Fixation

Although the new era in spine surgery is highly focused on preserving mobility, fusion is still an accepted way of treatment for a variety of spinal disorders. To stabilize the spine until a fusion consolidates, spine surgeons have used combinations of hooks, wires and pedicle screws. The main problem with these implants is the need for an extensive soft tissue dissection which potentially cont...

متن کامل

Translaminar facetal screw (Magerl's) fixation.

Translaminar facet screw fixation (TLFS) achieves stabilization of the vertebral motion segment by screws inserted at the base of the spinous process, through the opposite lamina, traversing the facet joint, and ending in the base of the transverse process. It is simple, does not require any specialized equipment, and has the advantages of being a procedure of lesser magnitude, lesser operative...

متن کامل

Posterior augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive fixation versus pedicle screws in vitro.

STUDY DESIGN An in vitro biomechanical comparison of four posterior fixation techniques in the setting of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). OBJECTIVE To compare the initial stability, in terms of range of motion and neutral zone, provided by pedicle screws, facet screws, translaminar facet screws, and H-graft plus interspinous cables in the presence of an anteriorly placed femoral r...

متن کامل

Finite element analysis of 3 posterior fixation techniques in the lumbar spine.

This study compared the biomechanics of 3 fixation techniques: bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation, unilateral pedicle screw (UPS) fixation, and UPS supplemented with translaminar facet screw (UPS+TLFS) fixation. The study was conducted in an L3-L5 finite element model. Three different finite element models were created by adopting different fixation techniques after removal of the left L3-L...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006